From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2003 17:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14958 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 17:15:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2003 17:15:37 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (tf0239.peakpeak.com [204.144.239.239]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3.1) with ESMTP id KAA07761; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:15:29 -0700 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9248A4F867A; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:07:47 -0700 (MST) To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: mark@codesourcery.com, GCC Hackers Subject: Re: Using g++ to build java? References: <200304020250.VAA12000@caip.rutgers.edu> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: My ELBOW is a remote FRENCH OUTPOST!! Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200304020250.VAA12000@caip.rutgers.edu> Message-ID: <87k7ecu8t8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kaveh" == Kaveh R Ghazi writes: Kaveh> So, did we come to a conclusion about whether to use C++ in Java and Kaveh> how to accomplish it while bootstrapping? Kaveh> Are there any objections to proceeding? If we're concerned about Kaveh> diverging from 3.3 and creating merge conflicts, I believe all of Kaveh> these changes will be so simple that we could safely put them in both Kaveh> mainline and branch. FWIW, I haven't been able to find the time to work on merging the libgcj verifier back into gcj. This certainly won't happen for 3.3. So perhaps the divergence isn't an issue. Tom