From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15893 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2011 04:57:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 15880 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2011 04:57:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 04:57:29 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RCOyV-0004MU-1M for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:57:27 +0200 Received: from 61.245.23.167.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([61.245.23.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:57:26 +0200 Received: from miles by 61.245.23.167.eo.eaccess.ne.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:57:26 +0200 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: Long-term plan for C++98/C++11 incompatibility Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 07:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87liswjd1w.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 FWIW, I seem to have no obvious problems compiling with -std=c++0x, and then linking with system c++ libraries that were presumably compiled using default options.... (e.g., I use the OpenEXR library, which is C++) So if there are incompatibilities, they don't seem to be fatal... -Miles -- Hers, pron. His.