From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-86942-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7793 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 21:53:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7770 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 21:53:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.73.237.138)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 21:53:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 4335 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 21:48:30 -0000
Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83)
  by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 21:48:30 -0000
Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu,  4 Dec 2003 13:53:53 -0800
From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Cc: Ben Elliston <bje@wasabisystems.com>,  rms@gnu.org,  gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
	  binutils@sources.redhat.com,  gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
References: <8765hf4c8z.fsf@wasabisystems.com>
	<87wu9mt79r.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
	<871xrs5b9j.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87znegqb31.fsf@codesourcery.com>
	<87brqsw9d9.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
	<871xroqlaf.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
	<87n0aaj4cl.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
	<87wu9esxu6.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
	<E1ARacX-0004dy-6z@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87ad69rf42.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
	<E1ARnzC-0007tg-2x@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87y8tsx58e.fsf@codesourcery.com> <8765gwvowl.fsf@wasabisystems.com>
	<87r7zkb6xm.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:07:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <87r7zkb6xm.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of
 "04 Dec 2003 13:37:41 -0800")
Message-ID: <87llpsp7v2.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2

Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU> writes:

> Ben Elliston <bje@wasabisystems.com> writes:
>
>> I'm convinced that the proposed change ... would have too much
>> impact on users (both of Autoconf and auxillary config.* users).
>
> OK, how about the following more-conservative change instead?  

This still requires a nonzero number of autoconf scripts to change and
is therefore unacceptable.

zw