From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24924 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2001 19:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24726 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 19:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 19:48:44 -0000 Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.124 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for gcc.gnu.org id m16EbqT-001XAdC; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 20:48:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 16EbqE-0001ma-00; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 20:48:26 +0100 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 16EcEp-0000Rz-00; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:13:51 +0100 To: Nicolas BRUNOT Cc: "'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'" Subject: Re: Bug in gnatmake References: <84D96459484FB546AC2624D433B6FF70E3C0@dmz3.domaine1.cadwin.com> From: Florian Weimer Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <84D96459484FB546AC2624D433B6FF70E3C0@dmz3.domaine1.cadwin.com> (Nicolas BRUNOT's message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:34:37 +0100") Message-ID: <87n10mop34.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00714.txt.bz2 Nicolas BRUNOT writes: > It seems there is a bug in gnatmake when the link argument is too long > This can be checked on Linux Redhat 7.0, Windows cygwin and Windows mingw32 > with the following command > > gnatmake whatever.adb -largs -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 > -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 > -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 -lX11 > > that comes probably from the Linker_Switches declared in > gcc/gcc/ada/make.ads This is PR 4851. A fix has been submitted to gcc-patches, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg00707.html .