From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110229 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2019 08:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110221 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2019 08:28:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:28:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25BC10C092D; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (dhcp-192-200.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AC8F5C226; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:28:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Steve Ellcey Cc: "gcc\@gcc.gnu.org" , "tuliom\@linux.ibm.com" Subject: Re: RFC: Extending --with-advance-toolchain to aarch64 References: <87a7a8mu2k.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <57692cef07f22523391e395897acc5129c0c9c6c.camel@marvell.com> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <57692cef07f22523391e395897acc5129c0c9c6c.camel@marvell.com> (Steve Ellcey's message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:55:23 +0000") Message-ID: <87o8ynlm7x.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 * Steve Ellcey: > I am not sure, but my guess is that it is because I am building > binutils (including ld) using --with-sysroot. That could be the case. I guess there are two conflicting use cases for sysroots, one where you want to mangle run-time paths to confine things to the sysroot, and one where the run-time paths are different from the sysroot paths (so it's more like a cross-compiler, even if the target is native). Thanks, Florian