From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40113 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2019 09:39:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 40105 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2019 09:39:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=our X-HELO: mail-out.m-online.net Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:39:50 +0000 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46b5CR1xglz1rTZ0; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:39:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46b5CR1F5tz1qqkM; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:39:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnXmS-uFm-d8; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:39:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hase.home (ppp-46-244-173-86.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.173.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:39:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hase.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45C1F101C93; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 11:39:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Jeff Law , "Richard Earnshaw \(lists\)" , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> <20190921091058.GV9749@gate.crashing.org> X-Yow: Yow! It's a hole all the way to downtown Burbank! Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190921091058.GV9749@gate.crashing.org> (Segher Boessenkool's message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:10:58 -0500") Message-ID: <87o8ze3s4l.fsf@hase.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 On Sep 21 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:49:36AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> With the SVN repo going read-only it becomes our fallback plan in case >> of major unexpected problems. >> >> Joseph's recommendation for having the old objects/refs in the new repo >> makes a lot of sense. So if it works, it's got my support as well. > > That potentially (and probably) makes the repository a lot bigger. Since all the blobs are identical the overhead will be very small. There is also the possibility to put the old refs in a different refs namespace so that they are not cloned by default. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."