From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-172984-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23212 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2012 11:04:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 23199 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2012 11:04:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (HELO mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr) (192.134.164.105)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:03:57 +0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pluto) ([193.50.110.167])  by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 16 Mar 2012 12:03:55 +0100
From: ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=)
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,  Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,  gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 4.7.0RC: Mangled names in cc1
References: <877gyu85mc.fsf@inria.fr>	<CA+=Sn1kdNMTKq+GTkEvCWyoRGz90D9XV29UGC8OxTTgXjvQMOw@mail.gmail.com>	<87ty1y6oq2.fsf@inria.fr>	<mcrsjhhn7or.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>	<877gytvl0o.fsf@inria.fr>	<mcry5r9lq5e.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>	<87r4x1r9re.fsf@inria.fr>	<mcr8vj9lkai.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>	<87pqciurih.fsf@inria.fr>	<CAFiYyc2Xuc5YVafL2L=qxVvmGoWcjUPP9j2cg4h6sL_XYk4L+g@mail.gmail.com>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 27 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vent=F4se?= an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA  D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4
X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:04:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2Xuc5YVafL2L=qxVvmGoWcjUPP9j2cg4h6sL_XYk4L+g@mail.gmail.com>	(Richard Guenther's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:10:44 +0100")
Message-ID: <87obrwyfhg.fsf@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2

Hi,

After writing an Autoconf macro that determines whether to build
plug-ins with gcc or g++ [0], I realized that nested functions, which my
plug-in uses extensively, are not supported in C++.

Any suggestions on how to address this?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.

[0] https://gforge.inria.fr/scm/viewvc.php/trunk/m4/gcc.m4?root=3Dstarpu&r1=
=3D6090&r2=3D6195