From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D413858C66 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 17:06:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 79D413858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org References: <877cth66qb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20230509102201.6aa2a7d14fdb2f1e7abff449@killthe.net> <87r0rp5uf8.fsf@aarsen.me> <83ttwla1ep.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.3; emacs 29.0.90 From: Sam James To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= , dave@killthe.net, jwakely.gcc@gmail.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: More C type errors by default for GCC 14 Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 18:05:09 +0100 In-reply-to: <83ttwla1ep.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87r0rpjuyr.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eli Zaretskii via Gcc writes: >> Cc: Jonathan Wakely , gcc@gcc.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 18:38:05 +0200 >> From: Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 via Gcc >>=20 >> You're actively dismissing the benefit. > > Which benefit? > > No one has yet explained why a warning about this is not enough, and > why it must be made an error. Florian's initial post doesn't explain > that, and none of the followups did, although questions about whether > a warning is not already sufficient were asked. > > That's a simple question, and unless answered with valid arguments, > the proposal cannot make sense to me, at least. My email covers this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-May/241269.html. I'd also note that some of the issues I've seen were already flagged in people's CI but they didn't notice because it was just a warning. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZFp9fF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZAmgQEA1Ibcspwy9L6JvuZI7YsK0Wa9oBSstGbG5BKU cavjVuoA/RX+WbLBbdtuk8cWOfb0wKcGXH+HaVN7HkJ8yFsSTUgE =+BKd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--