From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14563 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 18:24:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14548 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 18:24:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 18:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17780 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 18:24:06 -0000 Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 18:24:06 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:24:06 -0700 To: "Dave Korn" Cc: "'Adam Monsen'" , Subject: Re: warn/croak on "string" "string" auto-joins References: From: Zack Weinberg Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Dave Korn's message of "Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:07:37 +0100") Message-ID: <87r7q539o9.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00799.txt.bz2 "Dave Korn" writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Zack Weinberg >> Sent: 17 August 2004 19:01 > >> "Dave Korn" writes: >> >> > More seriously though, I don't see why there shouldn't be >> one, but rather >> > than make coders go through and lint-markup every place >> where we really >> > meant to concat two strings in a macro (one of which has >> only just been >> > en-quoted), maybe the warning should just default to "off"? >> >> I'm wondering how useful it would be without lint-markup even if it >> *did* default to off. >> >> zw > > > Point taken. Maybe a more useful set of options than "on/off" would be > "on/off/off in system headers but on in application files" All warnings are off in system headers anyway. Why don't you and Adam talk this over and come up with a specification that would work for you? zw