From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-72001-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6637 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 00:06:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6630 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 00:06:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 00:06:24 -0000
Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 195aRL-0001f0-00; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:06:15 -0700
To: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@motorola.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:16:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CD78B7D5-6F9D-11D7-8C8A-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com> (Kumar
 Gala's message of "Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:55:57 -0500")
Message-ID: <87r8839uh4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
References: <CD78B7D5-6F9D-11D7-8C8A-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00744.txt.bz2

Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@motorola.com> writes:

> Why dont you have plans to merge this branch back into 3.3?  It would
> seem useful to make sure that the e500 support in 3.3 was correct, and
> a number of Aldy's patches that have been made to the mainline do that.

It is not appropriate to do it now, when we are trying to stabilize
the branch for the 3.3.0 release.  It may well be a good thing to do
for 3.3.1, but that decision I leave to the PowerPC port maintainers.
I'm certainly not going to object to a merge.

zw