From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22338 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 09:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22266 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 09:39:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 09:39:10 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0M9d9l24279; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 04:39:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (vpnuser2.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.9.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0M9d8a20435; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 04:39:08 -0500 Received: from rsandifo by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AjbJc-0000CI-00; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:39:56 +0000 To: Joern Rennecke Cc: rth@redhat.com (Richard Henderson), roger@eyesopen.com (Roger Sayle), gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha References: <200401201905.i0KJ54i02295@linsvr1.uk.superh.com> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200401201905.i0KJ54i02295@linsvr1.uk.superh.com> (Joern Rennecke's message of "Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:05:04 +0000 (GMT)") Message-ID: <87smi8coer.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01737.txt.bz2 Joern Rennecke writes: > I don't have any access to mips or alpha machines, so could someone else > test this? Bootstrapped & regression tested on mips64-linux-gnu (3.4 branch) without problems. Thanks for the patch. Richard