From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E042386197D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:21:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7E042386197D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DWs1D2GlJz1rxLc; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:21:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DWs1D0bzcz1t6pp; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:21:20 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2lr0gplK8hkh; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:21:18 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: ghLqI78U6hhINWBg8v3zHPeEhrGQG2DquGT8Tjzv+pZBoI4TluLrZ5fHxR6gSoA1 Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-168-92.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.168.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:21:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 523DE2C3762; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:21:18 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: David Brown Cc: AJ D , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Comma Operator - Left to Right Associativity References: <59add9a1-ef9b-1cde-a4b7-66a167595a6b@hesbynett.no> X-Yow: Yow! We're going to a new disco! Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 22:21:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <59add9a1-ef9b-1cde-a4b7-66a167595a6b@hesbynett.no> (David Brown's message of "Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:58:33 +0100") Message-ID: <87v9b7v8a9.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 21:21:25 -0000 On Feb 04 2021, David Brown wrote: > For the built-in comma operator, you get guaranteed order of evaluation > (or more precisely, guaranteed order of visible side-effects). But for > a user-defined comma operator, you do not - until C++17, which has > guaranteed evaluation ordering in some circumstances. But not the evaluation order of function arguments. See Sequenced-before rules, rule 15. > Try your test again with "-std=c++17" or "-std=g++17" - if the order is > still reversed, it's a gcc bug (AFAICS). I don't think so. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."