From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18518 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 23:41:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18498 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 23:41:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.73.237.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 23:41:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11187 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 23:36:30 -0000 Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 23:36:30 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:41:53 -0800 From: "Zack Weinberg" To: Ben Elliston Cc: Joe Buck , Alexandre Oliva , Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} References: <871xroqlaf.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87n0aaj4cl.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87wu9esxu6.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87ad69rf42.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87y8tsx58e.fsf@codesourcery.com> <8765gwvowl.fsf@wasabisystems.com> <87r7zkb6xm.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <20031204151345.A23762@synopsys.com> <874qwgp3jm.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87y8tstapz.fsf@wasabisystems.com> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87y8tstapz.fsf@wasabisystems.com> (Ben Elliston's message of "05 Dec 2003 10:38:32 +1100") Message-ID: <87vfownoam.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 Ben Elliston writes: > Some people care because the output of config.guess does not match the > well-known name by which that operating system and version are known. > This is, admittedly, potentially confusing to newbies who think they > are using a Solaris 7 system and config.guess tells them they are > using Solaris 2.7. Okay, but I can't countenance that as justification for any kind of incompatible change, not even one that only changes behavior for as yet unreleased versions of Solaris. (People have already written configure scripts that expect Solaris 10 will be identified as *-sun-solaris2.10.) zw