From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13618 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 21:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13594 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2002 21:10:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2002 21:10:00 -0000 Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0196.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.196]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26575; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:09:57 -0600 Received: (from tromey@localhost) by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA02489; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:11:58 -0600 To: Janis Johnson Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: status of GCC 3.1 integration testing on ia64-linux References: <20020405135734.A17354@us.ibm.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: I FORGOT to do the DISHES!! Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 14:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Janis Johnson's message of "Fri, 5 Apr 2002 13:57:34 -0800" Message-ID: <87vgb3xlgi.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Janis" == Janis Johnson writes: Janis> Steve Christiansen and I have been testing the GCC 3.1 prerelease on Janis> ia64-unknown-linux-gnu. Our automated nightly testing does the Janis> following: Janis> bootstrap and test GCC (C, C++, and Fortran 77 only; Objective C and Janis> Java are included in a 3.1 bootstrap and test on a separate system Janis> so that Java build breakage doesn't prevent our other testing) Do you mean some transient java build breakage? Or is there something wrong right now? If so, what is it? Is there a PR? My understanding is that right now gcj and libgcj build and test fine on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu. Tom