From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C648A3858438
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:32:32 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C648A3858438
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-658-dQ0BoE5_OAKdEYBzVUQGZA-1; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:32:28 -0400
X-MC-Unique: dQ0BoE5_OAKdEYBzVUQGZA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.11.54.7])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539453C2F766;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.9])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B735D141511A;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:32:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: lkcl via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: lkcl <luke.leighton@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark
References: <CAPweEDxwqufkAcaWmQa_0Pcm-KQ9cr+XfyqyeMXtcVg1Gt6YuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPweEDwN_qzA1Ehpqqw5-Vwxr8G5ajY1N4ESt=UFGTK4gDBJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 20:32:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDwN_qzA1Ehpqqw5-Vwxr8G5ajY1N4ESt=UFGTK4gDBJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
 (lkcl via Gcc's message of "Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:30:55 +0100")
Message-ID: <87wncaw9ty.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:32:35 -0000

* lkcl via Gcc:

> if the Rust Foundation were to add an extremely simple phrase
>
>    "to be able to use the word rust in a distributed compiler your
>     modifications must 100% pass the test suite without modifying
>     the test suite"
>
> then all the problems and pain goes away.

No.  It would actually make matters worse for GCC in this case because
the stated intent is to ship without a borrow checker (=E2=80=9CThere are n=
o
immediate plans for a borrow checker as this is not required to compile
rust code=E2=80=9D, <https://rust-gcc.github.io/>, retrieved 2022-07-18).  =
There
are of course tests for the borrow checker in the Rust test suite, and
those that check for expected compiler errors will fail with GCC.

Thanks,
Florian