From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14786 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2009 19:19:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14778 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2009 19:19:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:19:53 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so3537398ewy.29 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.0.195 with SMTP id 3mr5561863ebc.87.1259090390531; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (rsandifo.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.89.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm923439ewy.7.2009.11.24.11.19.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:19:49 -0800 (PST) To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Mail-Followup-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" ,"Mark Mitchell" , "Richard Guenther" , , "Rainer Orth" , "Eric Botcazou" , , "David Edelsohn" , rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: "Mark Mitchell" , "Richard Guenther" , , "Rainer Orth" , "Eric Botcazou" , , "David Edelsohn" Subject: Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? References: <37061.10.0.66.17.1257785435.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org> <84fc9c000911090859r3170c8f4td8080089e5a4f242@mail.gmail.com> <4AF99CCB.8000104@codesourcery.com> <1B0EDB7E77DD48198510BAD9B902A291@glap> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1B0EDB7E77DD48198510BAD9B902A291@glap> (Kaveh R. Ghazi's message of "Thu\, 12 Nov 2009 08\:00\:30 -0700") Message-ID: <87y6lvwx0u.fsf@firetop.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2 "Kaveh R. Ghazi" writes: > Agreed. I guess my remaining questions are for AIX and mipsisa64-elf. > > Can someone please confirm that mipsisa64-elf is a cross-compile-only target > and therefore not relevant for host-based MPC portability testing? Yes, that's right. I'm sure it's technically possible to compile GCC with a mipsisa64-elf compiler, but it would be hard, and it isn't a well-defined operation. I don't think you could do it with the usual libgloss runtime environment; you'd need to use a "real" OS. Richard