public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: basic-improvements call for testers
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> (raw)


I have now committed a merge from trunk to the 3.4 basic-improvements
branch.  My tests show only one significant difference between
testsuite results on the mainline and the branch: that is an
additional failure of the libjava testsuite.  As the libjava test
suite is currently in bad shape with 65 unexpected failures on the
mainline, I am not inclined to hold the merge over it.  A pseudo-diff
is appended to this message; if a test suite isn't mentioned, it had
no differences at all between mainline and branch.

Please test the branch and report results using test_summary, but also
copy me; I don't follow gcc-testresults.

I'm aware of three blocker issues for the merge:

- The 32x64 HOST_WIDE_INT problem, which I will be addressing shortly.
- foobar-c.c lacking appropriate dependencies on coretypes.h $(TM_H),
  which I will also address shortly.
- The Darwin sqrt stub problem, which I don't know enough about to
  fix; I'd appreciate it if one of the people experiencing it could
  look into a patch.

If you know of or discover other issues which you think should block
the merge, please say so.

Regarding check-in policies, I would recommend the following:

- For the time being, nothing goes onto mainline unless it is also
  going onto the 3.3 release branch.  To make my life easier, please
  test and apply such patches on the basic-improvements branch also.

- basic-improvements is open for checkins under its usual rules,
  i.e. Stage 2 patches only.

I'd like to get the blocker issues all resolved and the branch merged
to mainline by Monday.  Any help you can lend is greatly appreciated.

zw

--- mainline/report     2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
+++ 3.4bib/report       2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
 
-Compiler version: 3.3 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
+Compiler version: 3.4-bi 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

                === g++ Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes           7891
+# of expected passes           7899
 # of unexpected failures       2
-# of expected failures         92
+# of expected failures         90
 # of untested testcases        9
 # of unsupported tests         3
 
                === gcc Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes           20746
+# of expected passes           20781
 # of unexpected failures       6
 # of expected failures         64
-# of unsupported tests         73
+# of unsupported tests         75

                === libjava tests ===

 ...
 WARNING: program timed out.
 FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
 WARNING: program timed out.
+FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test
+WARNING: program timed out.
 FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
 FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
 FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
 ...
 
                === libjava Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes           2772
-# of unexpected failures       65
+# of expected passes           2770
+# of unexpected failures       66
 # of expected failures         14
-# of untested testcases        69
+# of untested testcases        70

             reply	other threads:[~2002-12-14 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-14 11:22 Zack Weinberg [this message]
2002-12-14 11:30 ` Jan Hubicka
2002-12-14 14:26 ` Andreas Tobler
2002-12-15 15:09   ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-15 15:28     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-16 11:45       ` Andreas Tobler
2002-12-16 11:49       ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-16 12:03         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 12:53           ` Geoff Keating
2002-12-14 16:16 ` Andrew Pinski
2002-12-15 11:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-12-16  4:51 ` libjava testresults (Was: basic-improvements call for testers) Mark Wielaard
2002-12-16  8:36   ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-17  5:23     ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-18  2:25       ` Mark Wielaard
2002-12-18  5:18   ` libjava testresults Zack Weinberg
2002-12-18 10:23     ` Tom Tromey
2002-12-15  8:40 basic-improvements call for testers Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2002-12-15 15:30 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-12-16  1:17   ` Jan Hubicka
2002-12-15 16:29 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2002-12-15 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-16 14:55 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2002-12-16 15:08 ` Jan Hubicka
2002-12-16 15:51 ` Eric Christopher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com \
    --to=zack@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).