From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29736 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2002 18:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29729 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2002 18:36:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2002 18:36:51 -0000 Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18NH9e-0001nt-00 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 10:36:50 -0800 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: basic-improvements call for testers From: Zack Weinberg Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00793.txt.bz2 I have now committed a merge from trunk to the 3.4 basic-improvements branch. My tests show only one significant difference between testsuite results on the mainline and the branch: that is an additional failure of the libjava testsuite. As the libjava test suite is currently in bad shape with 65 unexpected failures on the mainline, I am not inclined to hold the merge over it. A pseudo-diff is appended to this message; if a test suite isn't mentioned, it had no differences at all between mainline and branch. Please test the branch and report results using test_summary, but also copy me; I don't follow gcc-testresults. I'm aware of three blocker issues for the merge: - The 32x64 HOST_WIDE_INT problem, which I will be addressing shortly. - foobar-c.c lacking appropriate dependencies on coretypes.h $(TM_H), which I will also address shortly. - The Darwin sqrt stub problem, which I don't know enough about to fix; I'd appreciate it if one of the people experiencing it could look into a patch. If you know of or discover other issues which you think should block the merge, please say so. Regarding check-in policies, I would recommend the following: - For the time being, nothing goes onto mainline unless it is also going onto the 3.3 release branch. To make my life easier, please test and apply such patches on the basic-improvements branch also. - basic-improvements is open for checkins under its usual rules, i.e. Stage 2 patches only. I'd like to get the blocker issues all resolved and the branch merged to mainline by Monday. Any help you can lend is greatly appreciated. zw --- mainline/report 2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800 +++ 3.4bib/report 2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800 -Compiler version: 3.3 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) +Compiler version: 3.4-bi 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) === g++ Summary === -# of expected passes 7891 +# of expected passes 7899 # of unexpected failures 2 -# of expected failures 92 +# of expected failures 90 # of untested testcases 9 # of unsupported tests 3 === gcc Summary === -# of expected passes 20746 +# of expected passes 20781 # of unexpected failures 6 # of expected failures 64 -# of unsupported tests 73 +# of unsupported tests 75 === libjava tests === ... WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test WARNING: program timed out. +FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test +WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test ... === libjava Summary === -# of expected passes 2772 -# of unexpected failures 65 +# of expected passes 2770 +# of unexpected failures 66 # of expected failures 14 -# of untested testcases 69 +# of untested testcases 70