From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9514 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2002 23:17:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9498 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2002 23:17:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2002 23:17:06 -0000 Received: from creche.cygnus.com (ta0203.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.203]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15665; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:17:03 -0600 Received: (from tromey@localhost) by creche.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA01586; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:22:10 -0600 To: Mark Mitchell Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease References: <70140000.1019331966@gandalf.codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: It's hard being an ARTIST!! Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Mark Mitchell's message of "Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:46:06 -0700" Message-ID: <87y9firm5a.fsf@creche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01009.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell writes: Mark> Here is a list of the current high-priority bugs order by Mark> category. I suspect that some of these (Java bugs, especially) Mark> are not really regressions. Mark> PR6314 gcj -R options conflicts with gcc I'm working on a patch. This isn't a regression per se but letting this go out unfixed would be irresponsible. Mark> PR6066 incorrect error message compiling classpath This is a regression, sort of. We used to be able to compile Classpath. Now Classpath has changed (but is still valid code) and we can't compile it. It is a regression in the utility of gcj. Tom