From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6953858C83 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 23:35:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6D6953858C83 Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-301-XLEZwqdoNiWzKuMljg6zWQ-1; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 18:35:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: XLEZwqdoNiWzKuMljg6zWQ-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id p20-20020a05620a22b400b0047ecab0db4fso9802315qkh.2 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:35:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M5BUCGtZlX37eVDYhAUodLOiDq87VrYkoqv6h1ujPsI=; b=FgIGqWbO4UlWEASYwiDnKPsBq8IMkgP11cnAajGB0hycmBsswcU7QKHvhLD+Rm4gZs kM2M5vyaaAnfXVI7/K9Pf7/d2uQp2bpH4o1nTbMR1RoIPXCziQ6GLyJv8uifWses1cse EyWYyBTOqN5LQ2nt0pXNkmtQukaHgbtcDcLT17GpJFeorAU/6AVCqoBchmsSWQ1Z07Wp a7+3SBlgwgcfswU3NiV0sRxjqiZBqMMFHsg/p77U8L+y9gnsMIHiK4mGO9ega9CZLwfp AXXH0bysCHOW9947jTeIzf6Aq2NPg3UqAftsOa9Bx5kPbJt30bN7g5zEfkihJ/axft3Z MKfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fywkajPbtrDk+aoULkgM4mL/5sDkVxBZSLSXFtIrFuenDYSaI o7AMWPpGFlolY0PYJdxvEujSadkIEVR/oRF1iWyWpqTLLTtqDfo6y1+tLULdPKK8zJzygb60uZM 7hyJo0wo= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5dcd:: with SMTP id e13mr1381863qtx.379.1644276942480; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:35:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqFzfVXEBO+Fm0OiGtTri7IPnMrgU115beYW7120M0BEzkdw3YZurZLSwYZ5A0F4qMFXDG4g== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5dcd:: with SMTP id e13mr1381852qtx.379.1644276942255; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from t14s.localdomain (c-73-69-212-193.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.69.212.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y15sm6121368qko.95.2022.02.07.15.35.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:35:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <894a81430f39aef561355f09f3e49bebe02cb76b.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: avoid analyzer asm failures on non-Linux From: David Malcolm To: FX Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson , GCC Mailing List , Iain Sandoe Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 18:35:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <37DCD537-51A8-4376-B244-61432E10748D@gmail.com> <20220121000835.2354878-1-dmalcolm@redhat.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 23:35:45 -0000 On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 18:08 +0100, FX wrote: > Hi David, > > > Thanks.  I extended your patch as follows, which works successfully > > for > > me on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > > > Does the following look OK for the analyzer asm failures on > > x86_64-apple-darwin? > > Sorry for the late reply… yes it does! Thanks. I've committed it to trunk as r12-7085-gf30e65e94d14a2. Dave