From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26449 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2003 14:19:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26418 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2003 14:19:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2003 14:19:45 -0000 Received: from gnat.com (adsl-98-116.bway.net [216.220.98.116]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1F2F28C0; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:19:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:58:00 -0000 Subject: Re: GNAT nightmarre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar), gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: Gabriel Dos Reis From: Geert Bosch In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <8ADBEC3A-32CB-11D7-9E39-00039344BF4A@gnat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01468.txt.bz2 On Tuesday, Jan 28, 2003, at 08:54 America/New_York, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > In fact, I suspect that it is the lack of explicit qualification of > gnatbind that leads to the nightmarra I got this night :-( I think so. We really should build it as xgnatbind and then rename it during install.