From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-117983-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4992 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2005 16:42:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4968 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2005 16:42:22 -0000
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:42:22 +0000
Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204])
	by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j72GgKXm008636
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.17) with ESMTP id <T7282fab4f3118064cc37c@mailgate2.apple.com>;
 Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:42:20 -0700
Received: from [17.219.193.60] (vpn-scv-x1-60.apple.com [17.219.193.60])
	by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j72GgGCB023331
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF48530CF0.1285C572-ONC2257051.00271A34-C2257051.00277352@il.ibm.com>
References: <OF48530CF0.1285C572-ONC2257051.00271A34-C2257051.00277352@il.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8B122C4B-753D-4301-B1F3-65852BD0E7EB@apple.com>
Cc: mcrosier@ncsu.edu, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Devang Patel <dpatel@apple.com>
Subject: Re: #pragma support to guide autovectorizer
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:42:00 -0000
To: Dorit Naishlos <DORIT@il.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2


On Aug 2, 2005, at 12:10 AM, Dorit Naishlos wrote:

>> I was wondering if any addition work had been completed toward pragma
>> support for the autovectorization branch (see
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01560.html)?
>
> I think Devang was planning to continue this work - I'm not sure  
> where it
> stands

I made some progress and it is still on my list, but right now I'm
fighting fire-fight on debugging issues. Developers are making
lots of noise on this front, once they switch to gcc-4.0.

This work has missed 4.1 train.

-
Devang