From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74719-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 682 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 18:38:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 658 invoked from network); 20 May 2003 18:38:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 May 2003 18:38:40 -0000
Received: from nr2-216-196-136-17.fuse.net ([216.196.136.17] helo=dellpi.pinski.fam)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19IBvm-0005o8-W1
	for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:33:47 -0400
Received: from physics.uc.edu (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1])
	by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h4KIXXMJ024133;
	Tue, 20 May 2003 14:33:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:41:00 -0000
Subject: Re: libsupc++,  _cxa  references, and Dinkum libcpp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, "Joe Buck" <jbuck@synopsys.com>,
   <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
To: <gp@qnx.com>
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200305201721.h4KHLYi08937@webmail.ott.qnx.com>
Message-Id: <8D3364E0-8AF1-11D7-AF3E-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01890.txt.bz2

Not really, they are part of the C++ abi used by gcc, the ia64 c++ abi.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski



On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 13:21 US/Eastern, <gp@qnx.com> wrote:

>
> So to clarify my understanding, the __cxa symbols being emitted by 
> cc1plus are
> part of the C++ standard, and are missing from Dinkumware, yes?