From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4286 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2008 00:15:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 4275 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2008 00:15:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:14:49 +0000 Received: from spaceape13.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape13.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.147]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m5C0EgC4018302 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:14:42 +0100 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wff29.prod.google.com [10.142.6.29]) by spaceape13.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m5C0EeMH029988 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:14:41 +0100 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so3490963wff.1 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.35.4 with SMTP id n4mr205039wfj.64.1213229680601; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.163.18 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0e66f0806111714v23813bfby5b4ded70ea11b2b2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:15:00 -0000 From: "Bill Maddox" To: "Ollie Wild" Subject: Re: [lto] What is lto_file_vtable for? Cc: "GCC Development" , "Kenneth Zadeck" In-Reply-To: <65dd6fd50806111638t7cf6ff28vc8f2cc268b4ecb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <65dd6fd50806111638t7cf6ff28vc8f2cc268b4ecb@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Ollie Wild wrote: > From what I can tell from grepping the lto source, the vtable entry in > lto_file is set but never used. Is this old code that never got > removed or the beginning of an idea that never got implemented? > > I'm inclined to remove it if it's not doing anything. It was needed when the LTO reader had to map DWARF2 sections. It is obsolete now. --Bill