From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9806 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 00:11:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9603 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 00:11:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 00:11:30 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAN0III5025158 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:11:29 -0800 Received: from [17.201.20.87] (mrs2.apple.com [17.201.20.87]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAN0BQbd006695; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:11:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D2CF60C-3919-11D9-8BD2-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <20041117212847.A26376@synopsys.com> <6F5FC748-7BBD-44B9-8DDC-246949F16102@apple.com> <20041118102741.A8347@synopsys.com> <77E8D36A-C0C2-4B03-964C-BEE0FE7BBBC3@apple.com> <98C86CD4-39E2-11D9-B2D5-000A95BCF344@apple.com> <20041119170011.A30410@synopsys.com> <9E6AD708-3A93-11D9-9070-000D9330C50E@apple.com> <20041119174042.A1311@synopsys.com> <90DC5074-3A96-11D9-9070-000D9330C50E@apple.com> <9CD04F70-3CC6-11D9-B847-000D9330C50E@apple.com> <7688EB08-3CC7-11D9-AEB4-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v679) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <92113AEA-211E-4C02-9D4E-936B0F67B1CC@apple.com> Cc: Matt Austern , Andrew Pinski , Steve Naroff , gcc mailing list , Michael Matz , Ziemowit Laski , Joe Buck Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Stump Subject: Re: generalized lvalues -- patch outline Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:27:00 -0000 To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2 On Nov 22, 2004, at 3:57 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > I fear there is a circular reasoning here I suspect the same thing, but do not know.