* [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C)
@ 2003-09-24 8:48 Matthias Klose
2003-09-24 9:16 ` Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Klose @ 2003-09-24 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: java
Between 20030909 and 20030923 I see the following additional
regressions on the branch (i486-linux, glibc-2.3.2):
gcc:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for errors, line 6)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for errors, line 14)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for errors, line 19)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for errors, line 21)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pack-test-2.c (test for excess errors)
g++:
FAIL: g++.dg/parse/parameter-declaration-1.C (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/parse/parameter-declaration-1.C (test for excess errors)
libjava:
FAIL: Thread_Interrupt -O output - source compiled test
Fails:
wait()
interrupted - ok
sleep()
interrupted - ok
Busy waiting
Error: Busy wait was not interrupted.
join()
interrupted - ok
The gcc and g++ failures are seen on i586-linux builds as posted to
gcc-testresults as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C)
2003-09-24 8:48 [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C) Matthias Klose
@ 2003-09-24 9:16 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-09-25 1:18 ` Bryce McKinlay
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2003-09-24 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthias Klose; +Cc: gcc, java
> libjava:
> FAIL: Thread_Interrupt -O output - source compiled test
> Fails:
> wait()
> interrupted - ok
> sleep()
> interrupted - ok
> Busy waiting
> Error: Busy wait was not interrupted.
> join()
> interrupted - ok
IIRC this one is spurious: it doesn't fail if you run it manually.
--
Eric Botcazou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C)
2003-09-24 9:16 ` Eric Botcazou
@ 2003-09-25 1:18 ` Bryce McKinlay
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bryce McKinlay @ 2003-09-25 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Botcazou; +Cc: Matthias Klose, gcc, java
On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 19:55 Pacific/Auckland, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
>> libjava:
>> FAIL: Thread_Interrupt -O output - source compiled test
>> Fails:
>> wait()
>> interrupted - ok
>> sleep()
>> interrupted - ok
>> Busy waiting
>> Error: Busy wait was not interrupted.
>> join()
>> interrupted - ok
>
> IIRC this one is spurious: it doesn't fail if you run it manually.
It is timing-sensitive unfortunately, and I can see it failing if your
system is under heavy or variable load. Perhaps the particular part of
this test which is failing here should be removed.
Regards
Bryce.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-24 23:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-24 8:48 [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C) Matthias Klose
2003-09-24 9:16 ` Eric Botcazou
2003-09-25 1:18 ` Bryce McKinlay
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).