From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93CA0604-38E1-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C949FF38-2681-48A5-94D9-0228551C5902@apple.com>
Am Mittwoch, 17.11.04 um 21:26 Uhr schrieb Mike Stump:
> On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>> I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for mainline
>> gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the gcc-patches
>> and gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively silent
>> regarding this topic. Is all the work done now or did the release
>> plan slip backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)?
>
> Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection
> with no plan forward. The objection will either have to be withdrawn,
> or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can
> be made.
What kind of objection was that? (you can give me a pointer to the
archived mail at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/ or so)
Would it be possible to ask Geoff to get down to business?
>
> I think this should be resolved now, as as we push it forward, it will
> pass the drop dead date, and objective-c++ will have to be jettisoned
> from gcc 4.0.0. :-(
>
> Mark, I suppose we can discuss when that drop dead date is. Has it
> already passed?
Hopefully not!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-17 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53 ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf [this message]
2004-11-17 22:28 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02 ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50 ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 0:35 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:46 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18 1:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-11-18 23:28 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 0:57 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 1:26 ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19 1:41 ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19 4:26 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 5:49 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 6:42 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 7:52 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 3:22 ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04 ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08 ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93CA0604-38E1-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de \
--to=lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de \
--cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mrs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).