From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22738 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 21:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22690 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 21:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lee.int-rz.hamburg.de) (212.1.41.126) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 21:42:30 -0000 Received: from [80.137.185.253] (helo=hamburg.de) by lee.int-rz.hamburg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CUXZO-0000jO-DY; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:42:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:53:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org To: Mike Stump From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <93CA0604-38E1-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2 Am Mittwoch, 17.11.04 um 21:26 Uhr schrieb Mike Stump: > On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: >> I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for mainline >> gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the gcc-patches >> and gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively silent >> regarding this topic. Is all the work done now or did the release >> plan slip backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)? > > Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection > with no plan forward. The objection will either have to be withdrawn, > or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can > be made. What kind of objection was that? (you can give me a pointer to the archived mail at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/ or so) Would it be possible to ask Geoff to get down to business? > > I think this should be resolved now, as as we push it forward, it will > pass the drop dead date, and objective-c++ will have to be jettisoned > from gcc 4.0.0. :-( > > Mark, I suppose we can discuss when that drop dead date is. Has it > already passed? Hopefully not! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >