Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Hermann Lauer]

Hello Toon,

I'd like to tell you some experiences with nextstep3.3:

> This is probably an error in the autoconfed -Defines because
> NextStep does define those constants, e.g. in
> /usr/include/bsd/sys/stat.h

No, this constants aren't defined in /usr/include/bsd/sys/stat.h:

...
#ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE
        #define S_IRUSR _S_IRUSR        /* read permission, owner */
        #define S_IRGRP 0000040         /* read permission, group */
        #define S_IROTH 0000004         /* read permission, other */
        #define S_IWUSR _S_IWUSR        /* write permission, owner */
        #define S_IWGRP 0000020         /* write permission, group */
        #define S_IWOTH 0000002         /* write permission, other */
        #define S_IXUSR _S_IXUSR        /* execute/search permission, */
                                        /* owner */
        #define S_IXGRP 0000010         /* execute/search permission, */
                                        /* group */
        #define S_IXOTH 0000001         /* execute/search permission, */
                                        /* other */
        #define S_IRWXU 0000700         /* read, write, execute */
                                        /* permissions, owner */
        #define S_IRWXG 0000070         /* read, write, execute */
                                        /* permissions, group */
        #define S_IRWXO 0000007         /* read, write, execute */
                                        /* permissions, other */

        #define S_ISBLK(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFBLK))
        #define S_ISCHR(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFCHR))
        #define S_ISDIR(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFDIR))
        #define S_ISFIFO(mode)  (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFIFO))
        #define S_ISREG(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFREG))
#endif /* _POSIX_SOURCE */
....

The point is the #ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE.
NeXTStep has no posix support - yes, it claims to have it but the libposix.a is
heavily broken ! (look at deja news for NeXTStep & posix if you like to hear
some opinions...)

So every serious program (as gcc etc.) must avoid the -posix option to cc
(=gcc2.5.8 or so), which in turn defines _POSIX_SOURCE while compiling.

So forget all part's of the NeXTStep headers in the #ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE -
of course, some of them are nevertheless correct and can give you hints how to
implement them.

BTW: NeXT seems to know about the broken posix support - in OpenStep the
libposix.a is omitted - but the headers still includes that parts ! :-(

Best is to treat NeXTStep as a 4.3 BSD System.

Hope this helps you a little bit.

Greetings

   Hermann

Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Toon Moene]

Thanks to Hermann Lauer, I remembered again why I wanted to upgrade  
my home computing facilities to a POSIX comformant OS, i.e. Linux  
:-(

Due to his advice, I stopped trying to get dejagnu working on my  
m68k-next-nexststep3 system.  Adding -D_POSIX_SOURCE makes the one  
offending routine compile, but then you're hosed at link time (ld:  
`_mkfifo', whazdat ??).

So I took a less ambitious route, and ran c-torture-1.45 on egcs-971105:

% diff gcc2723.ctort egcs-971105.ctort
3,10d2
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6:
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: widechar-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
35,42d26
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6:
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: struct-ini-4.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
103,110d86
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1:
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-2.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
112,119d87
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1:
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
126,132d93
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 961122-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
136d96
< ERROR: 961017-2.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
138d97
< ERROR: 961017-1.c: compiled program got signal 26: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
140d98
< ERROR: 961004-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
145,152d102
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6:
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960801-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
159,165d108
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960419-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
168,175d110
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6:
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960405-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
177,180d111
< ERROR: 960402-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960402-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960402-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960402-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
183,190d113
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6:
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960326-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
200,203d122
< ERROR: 960219-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960219-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960219-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960219-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
207,210d125
< ERROR: 960209-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960209-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960209-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960209-1.c: compiled program got signal 6: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
390c305
< Test completed with 107 failures
---
> Test completed with 22 failures
404,411d318
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1:
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 970214-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
415,421d321
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 961126-1.c: compiler seems to hang: -O3 -funroll-all-loops 
431,438d330
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10:
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960221-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O3 -funroll-all-loops 
441,448d332
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1:
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 960218-1.c: compiler returns exit status 1: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
452,458d335
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
< ERROR: 960106-1.c: compiler got signal 10: -O3 -funroll-all-loops 
676c553
< Test completed with 62 failures
---
> Test completed with 24 failures
683,690d559
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error:
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 951227-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
701,708d569
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error:
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O2  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O3  
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O3  
-fomit-frame-pointer
< ERROR: 930714-1.c: compiler accepts syntax error: -O3  
-funroll-all-loops
719c580
< Test completed with 16 failures
---
> Test completed successfully

In other words: egcs wins big time, hands down, etc.

"Insanely Great", to quote a well-known visionary :-)

Toon.

Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Hermann Lauer]

Hello Toon,

I'd like to tell you some experiences with nextstep3.3:

> This is probably an error in the autoconfed -Defines because
> NextStep does define those constants, e.g. in
> /usr/include/bsd/sys/stat.h

No, this constants aren't defined in /usr/include/bsd/sys/stat.h:

...
#ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE
        #define S_IRUSR _S_IRUSR        /* read permission, owner */
        #define S_IRGRP 0000040         /* read permission, group */
        #define S_IROTH 0000004         /* read permission, other */
        #define S_IWUSR _S_IWUSR        /* write permission, owner */
        #define S_IWGRP 0000020         /* write permission, group */
        #define S_IWOTH 0000002         /* write permission, other */
        #define S_IXUSR _S_IXUSR        /* execute/search permission, */
                                        /* owner */
        #define S_IXGRP 0000010         /* execute/search permission, */
                                        /* group */
        #define S_IXOTH 0000001         /* execute/search permission, */
                                        /* other */
        #define S_IRWXU 0000700         /* read, write, execute */
                                        /* permissions, owner */
        #define S_IRWXG 0000070         /* read, write, execute */
                                        /* permissions, group */
        #define S_IRWXO 0000007         /* read, write, execute */
                                        /* permissions, other */

        #define S_ISBLK(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFBLK))
        #define S_ISCHR(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFCHR))
        #define S_ISDIR(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFDIR))
        #define S_ISFIFO(mode)  (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFIFO))
        #define S_ISREG(mode)   (((mode) & (_S_IFMT)) == (_S_IFREG))
#endif /* _POSIX_SOURCE */
....

The point is the #ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE.
NeXTStep has no posix support - yes, it claims to have it but the libposix.a is
heavily broken ! (look at deja news for NeXTStep & posix if you like to hear
some opinions...)

So every serious program (as gcc etc.) must avoid the -posix option to cc
(=gcc2.5.8 or so), which in turn defines _POSIX_SOURCE while compiling.

So forget all part's of the NeXTStep headers in the #ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE -
of course, some of them are nevertheless correct and can give you hints how to
implement them.

BTW: NeXT seems to know about the broken posix support - in OpenStep the
libposix.a is omitted - but the headers still includes that parts ! :-(

Best is to treat NeXTStep as a 4.3 BSD System.

Hope this helps you a little bit.

Greetings

   Hermann

Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 9711130634.AA09636@moene.indiv.nluug.nl >you write:
  > >  This explains why fixincludes didn't look at your header
  > >  files; why don't you add /NextDeveloper/Headers and see
  > >  if fixincludes will do the right thing.
  > 
  > Yep, this works.
OK.  That will be in the next snapshot.

  > Now, if someone comes up with a good idea on how to fix  
  > dejagnu-971028 for NextStep, I can actually start the testing I  
  > promised ;-)
Yup, just trying to attack stuff one problem at a time :-)  Going to
try and look at some of the dejagnu stuff tonight/tomorrow.
jeff

Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Toon Moene]

Jeff,

>  In message < 9711120643.AA02701@moene.indiv.nluug.nl > I wrote:

  > Problem 1 is that fixincludes is not run on the directory
  > /NextDeveloper/Headers, which is one of the first directories
  > searched for header files on NextStep.

>  I see that gcc/config/m68k/x-next specifies:
>
>  # Specify other dirs of system header files to be fixed.
>  OTHER_FIXINCLUDES_DIRS= /LocalDeveloper/Headers
>
>  This explains why fixincludes didn't look at your header
>  files; why don't you add /NextDeveloper/Headers and see
>  if fixincludes will do the right thing.

Yep, this works.

Now, if someone comes up with a good idea on how to fix  
dejagnu-971028 for NextStep, I can actually start the testing I  
promised ;-)

Cheers,
Toon.

Re: Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 9711120643.AA02701@moene.indiv.nluug.nl >you write:
  > Problem 1 is that fixincludes is not run on the directory  
  > /NextDeveloper/Headers, which is one of the first directories  
  > searched for header files on NextStep.
I see that gcc/config/m68k/x-next specifies:

# Specify other dirs of system header files to be fixed.
OTHER_FIXINCLUDES_DIRS= /LocalDeveloper/Headers

This explains why fixincludes didn't look at your header files; why
don't you add /NextDeveloper/Headers and see if fixincludes will do
the right thing.

jeff

Build of egcs-971105 on m68k-next-nextstep3 successful

[Toon Moene]

Hi,

I finally managed to completely build egcs-971105 (core, g77 and  
g++) on m68k-next-nextstep3.

Problem 1 is that fixincludes is not run on the directory  
/NextDeveloper/Headers, which is one of the first directories  
searched for header files on NextStep.

Problem 2 was that my version of patch didn't remove the now  
obsolete files in libstdc++, but created empty ones (as correctly  
diagnosed by Jeff and Kriang).

Unfortunately, I still can't really *test* the compilers, as  
dejagnu doesn't build on my system:

make[1]: Entering directory  
`/Users/toon/Unix/compilers/dejagnu-971028/tcl'
make[2]: Entering directory  
`/Users/toon/Unix/compilers/dejagnu-971028/tcl/unix'
gcc -c -g -O2  -I./../generic -I. -DUSEGETWD=1 -DHAVE_OPENDIR=1  
-DHAVE_STRSTR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1 -DHAVE_TMPNAM=1 -DNO_UNAME=1  
-DNO_DIRENT_H=1 -DNO_VALUES_H=1 -DNO_DLFCN_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1  
-DUSE_SGTTY=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1  
-DHAVE_TM_ZONE=1 -DHAVE_TM_GMTOFF=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE_VAR=1  
-DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -Dmode_t=int -Dpid_t=int -DHAVE_ST_BLKSIZE=1  
-DHAVE_SIGNED_CHAR=1 -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1         
-DTCL_SHLIB_EXT=\".so\" ./tclUnixFCmd.c
./tclUnixFCmd.c: In function `TclpCreateDirectory':
./tclUnixFCmd.c:475: `S_IRUSR' undeclared (first use this function)
./tclUnixFCmd.c:475: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
./tclUnixFCmd.c:475: for each function it appears in.)
./tclUnixFCmd.c:475: `S_IWUSR' undeclared (first use this function)
./tclUnixFCmd.c:475: `S_IXUSR' undeclared (first use this function)
./tclUnixFCmd.c: In function `CopyFileAtts':
./tclUnixFCmd.c:877: storage size of `tval' isn't known
./tclUnixFCmd.c:881: `S_IRWXU' undeclared (first use this function)
./tclUnixFCmd.c:881: `S_IRWXG' undeclared (first use this function)
./tclUnixFCmd.c:881: `S_IRWXO' undeclared (first use this function)
make[2]: *** [tclUnixFCmd.o] Error 1

This is probably an error in the autoconfed -Defines because  
NextStep does define those constants, e.g. in  
/usr/include/bsd/sys/stat.h

HTH,
Toon.