From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: (1.0.2) std/bastring.h change -- Why add std/bastring.cc? 
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 23:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <9802180511.AA18538@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
References: <u967mem1o4.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-02/msg00843.html

Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:
> 
> I suppose we should resurrect sinst.h.
> 

Please do. I'd rather not see 1.0.2 released with the current scheme.
I just built a moderately large project hat went up 20% in disk usage 
and also about ~15% in link time on ELF, and on sparc-sunso4.1.3, the 
results were much worse both in time and space.

Regards,
Mumit -- khan@xraylith.wisc.edu
http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/