From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
To: law@cygnus.com
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: 1.0.3 pre-release available
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 08:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <9804261449.AA17362@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
References: <18538.893574081@hurl.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-04/msg01037.html

> I've made the egcs-1.0.3 prerelease available.

> 	* Fix typo in libio (HJ -- can you be more specific about
> 	what exactly you fixed?)

> 	* Fix the Fortran negative array index problem (again).

This indeed seems to be fixed (see below).

>	* Fix a few Alpha code generation and compiler abort problems
>	exposed by RedHat 5.1.

So there were Linux/Alpha problems ?  Shees, means that Joe was  
right after all - perhaps I missed it due to the ix86 advocates  
being so much more vocal (gives a whole new meaning to "devils  
advocate" :-)

>	* Fix 2 x86 code generation bugs exposed by glibc2 and
>	RedHat 5.1.

>	* Fix rs6000/ppc bug when converting from values from integer
>	types to floating point types in frameless functions.

This is what I got on a "Red Hat Linux release 4.2 (Biltmore)"  
Alpha system (alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnulibc1 according to  
configure).

Build & compare without problems.

Result of make -k check:

                === libio tests ===


                === libio Summary ===

# of expected passes            40

                === libstdc++ tests ===

FAIL: tstring.cc compilation
FAIL: tstring.cc -O compilation

                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            24
# of unexpected failures        2
# of expected failures          4

                === gcc tests ===

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution,  -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution,  -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution,  -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O2  
-fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            4856
# of unexpected failures        14
# of expected failures          5
# of unsupported tests          9

                === g++ tests ===

FAIL: g++.benjamin/p12475.C  (test for warnings, line 4)
XPASS: g++.brendan/array1.C overflow in array dimension.* , (test  
for errors, line 6)
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C  Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C  Execution test

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            3388
# of unexpected failures        3
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          82
# of untested testcases         10

                === g77 tests ===

FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution,  -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution,  -O1

                === g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes            130
# of unexpected failures        2

Furthermore, I tried the following Fortran example, which fails  
with egcs-1.0.2:

      program rotor
      implicit none
      integer   KaKc(0:5,-5:5,0:2)
      integer   cj
      call setkac( KaKc, 5 )
      stop
      end
c     ---------------------------------------------
      subroutine setkac( KaKc, Jmax )
      implicit none
      integer   Jmax
      integer   KaKc( 0:Jmax, -Jmax:Jmax, 0:2 )
      integer   cj, i
      cj = 0
      i = -cj
      KaKc( cj, i, 1 ) = 0
      write(*,*) 'Here we go !'
      KaKc( cj, -cj, 1 ) = 0
      return
      end

which would bomb after the message "Here we go !", and now  
completes succesfully.

Cheers,
Toon.