From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: egcs-1.1 release schedule
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 13:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9806222039.AA04066@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199806221217.FAA20123@dm.cobaltmicro.com>
[ Welcome to the world of the 32-bit wonders of incongruence ]
David "Sparc" Miller wrote:
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 22:31:31 -0600 From: Jeffrey
> A Law <law@cygnus.com>
> * The ABI is still going to mandate that some
> doubles in
> argument lists are going to be mis-aligned.
> We'd have to arrange to copy them from the
> arglist into a suitable stack slot. This
> may be more trouble than its worth.
> And there are still going to be issues with equivalence
> statements.
Sure. But folks doing that should *know* they're invoking
suboptimal behaviour.
OTOH, this way we could teach them ;-)
Cheers,
Toon.
PS: I agree with Jeff (even I don't know all the details - but I
love to have them to get my little brother finish his PhD thesis in
time :-) that the general problem simply is too hard (just consider
an odd number of arguments-passed-by-reference).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-06-22 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-06-18 1:32 Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-19 9:02 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1998-06-19 23:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-19 11:57 ` Dave Love
1998-06-21 21:43 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-21 23:07 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-22 5:19 ` David S. Miller
1998-06-22 12:04 ` Dave Love
1998-06-22 13:45 ` Toon Moene [this message]
1998-06-22 22:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-22 18:20 ` ix86 double alignment (was Re: egcs-1.1 release schedule) Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` David S. Miller
1998-06-23 6:30 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-23 5:13 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-22 12:04 ` ix86 `double' " Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-23 5:13 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-24 2:28 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-24 14:50 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-25 0:25 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-25 9:59 ` Tim Hollebeek
1998-06-28 18:01 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-22 12:04 ` egcs-1.1 release schedule Dave Love
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-23 9:29 ` H.J. Lu
1998-06-24 17:12 ` x86 double alignment (was egcs-1.1 release schedule) Marc Lehmann
1998-06-25 0:25 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-28 18:02 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-25 12:33 ` PÃ¥l-Kristian Engstad
1998-06-28 18:02 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-25 21:48 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-25 18:53 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-28 22:41 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-29 5:20 ` Martin Kahlert
1998-06-29 11:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-29 19:43 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-29 20:41 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-30 0:42 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-30 8:19 ` gcc2 merge H.J. Lu
1998-06-30 19:49 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-30 4:50 ` x86 double alignment (was egcs-1.1 release schedule) Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-20 6:41 ` egcs-1.1 release schedule Gabriel Dos Reis
1998-06-20 9:22 ` Joe Buck
1998-06-20 15:36 ` Mark Mitchell
1998-06-21 0:07 ` Jeffrey A Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9806222039.AA04066@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
--to=toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
--cc=davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).