From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13939 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 18:22:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13931 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 18:22:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:22:42 +0100 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id s2so111806uge for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr464141ugg.1176229360024; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.56.4 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <998d0e4a0704101122r7e6e664ao1440736e9a977118@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:30:00 -0000 From: "J.C. Pizarro" To: "Ian Lance Taylor" Subject: Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions. Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <998d0e4a0704101029m562e8264yee69e957dca6c76d@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 10 Apr 2007 10:53:08 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > As far as I can tell, you are recommending that gcc generate a > different code sequence than it currently does. The most helpful > approach you can use for such a suggestion is to open a bug report > marked as an enhancement. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html. > > Postings to gcc@gcc.gnu.org are not wrong, but they will almost > certainly get lost. An entry in the bug database will not get lost. > > Thanks. > > Ian > Thanks, bug reported as enhancement in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531