From: Francesco Petrogalli <Francesco.Petrogalli@arm.com>
To: "sellcey@cavium.com" <sellcey@cavium.com>
Cc: James Greenhalgh <James.Greenhalgh@arm.com>,
"Sekhar, Ashwin" <Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com>,
gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [Aarch64] Vector Function Application Binary Interface Specification for OpenMP
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 18:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB064BC-BB81-4D9F-B2EE-68CA08F9B222@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526487700.29509.6.camel@cavium.com>
Dear all,
I just want to let you know that we just published the final version of the Vector Function ABI specification. The call-clobbered and call-preserved lists of register has been updated (see section 2.1) .
The document is located at the same address:
https://developer.arm.com/products/software-development-tools/hpc/arm-compiler-for-hpc/vector-function-abi
Kind regards,
Francesco
> On May 16, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 18:29 +0000, Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I am happy to let you know that the Vector Function ABI for AArch64
>> is now public and available via the link at [1].
>>
>> Don’t hesitate to contact me in case you have any questions.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Francesco
>>
>> [1] https://developer.arm.com/products/software-development-tools/hpc
>> /arm-compiler-for-hpc/vector-function-abi
>>
>>>
>>> Steve Ellcey
>>> sellcey@cavium.com
>
> Thanks for publishing this Francesco, it looks like the main issue for
> GCC is that the Vector Function ABI has different caller saved / callee
> saved register conventions than the standard ARM calling convention.
>
> If I understand things correctly, in the standard calling convention
> the callee will only save the bottom 64 bits of V8-V15 and so the
> caller needs to save those registers if it is using the top half. In
> the Vector calling convention the callee will save all 128 bits of
> these registers (and possibly more registers) so the caller does not
> have to save these registers at all, even if it is using all 128 bits
> of them.
>
> It doesn't look like GCC has any existing mechanism for having different
> sets of caller saved/callee saved registers depending on the function
> attributes of the calling or called function.
>
> Changing what registers a callee function saves and restores shouldn't
> be too difficult since that can be done when generating the prologue
> and epilogue code but changing what registers a caller saves/restores
> when doing the call seems trickier. The macro
> TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED doesn't know anything about the
> function being called. It returns true/false depending on just the
> register number and mode.
>
> Steve Ellcey
> sellcey@cavium.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 21:47 Steve Ellcey
2018-05-15 18:29 ` Francesco Petrogalli
2018-05-16 16:21 ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-16 16:30 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2018-05-16 17:30 ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-16 21:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-24 17:50 ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-26 10:09 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-26 22:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-27 15:59 ` Jeff Law
2018-05-29 10:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-31 10:39 ` Alan Hayward
2018-06-12 3:11 ` Jeff Law
2018-06-11 23:06 ` Jeff Law
2018-07-02 18:16 ` Francesco Petrogalli [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-15 9:50 Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-03-17 14:02 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-03-20 4:30 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9BB064BC-BB81-4D9F-B2EE-68CA08F9B222@arm.com \
--to=francesco.petrogalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com \
--cc=James.Greenhalgh@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=sellcey@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).