From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20593 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2004 13:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20576 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2004 13:56:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO colo.khms.westfalen.de) (213.239.196.208) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2004 13:56:35 -0000 Received: from khms.vpn ([10.172.192.2]:53124 helo=khms.westfalen.de) by colo.khms.westfalen.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bvyyi-0005lk-3K for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:53:48 +0200 Received: from root (helo=khms.westfalen.de) by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bvyyd-0003pB-FW for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:53:43 +0200 Received: by khms.westfalen.de (CrossPoint v3.12d.kh14 R/C435); 14 Aug 2004 15:43:28 +0200 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:10:00 -0000 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <9EpQzYiXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <20040813142857.A15736@synopsys.com> Subject: Re: Where do I mention a branch in our web pages? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? References: <411BDA29.6030107@codesourcery.com> <20040813142857.A15736@synopsys.com> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00616.txt.bz2 Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM (Joe Buck) wrote on 13.08.04 in <20040813142857.A15736@synopsys.com>: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 09:19:08PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > How about creating a new section to cvs.html, called "Vendor Branches" > > for example, and documenting your branch there? Jeff, what do you think? > > Would you mind adding the rh- branches there as well? > > I'm not entirely sure that Vendor is the right word here, and I'm not sure > what such branches should be called (suggestions welcome). I would like > to see them listed somehow. Anything I came up with was worse, such as "Packager branches" ... MfG Kai