From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 02:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9Xi8IrWmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4295FA1C.2050103@coyotegulch.com>
scott.ladd@coyotegulch.com (Scott Robert Ladd) wrote on 26.05.05 in <4295FA1C.2050103@coyotegulch.com>:
> Paul Koning wrote:
> > Scott> Yes, but within the defined mathematical ranges for sine and
> > Scott> cosine -- [0, 2 * PI) -- the processor intrinsics are quite
> > Scott> accurate.
> I *said* that such statements are outside the standard range of
> trigonometric identities. Writing sin(100) is not a matter of necessity,
Actually, no, you did not say that.
You *said* "defined mathematical ranges". See above.
Which is just very, very wrong.
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-28 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-26 16:05 Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 16:09 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-26 16:33 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 17:14 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-26 17:01 ` Paolo Carlini
2005-05-26 17:23 ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-26 17:24 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 17:27 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 17:27 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 17:29 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 17:37 ` David Daney
2005-05-26 17:56 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 17:40 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 18:12 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 18:32 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 18:50 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 19:14 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-05-26 19:35 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-29 6:22 ` Geoffrey Keating
2005-05-31 14:34 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-31 22:58 ` Geoff Keating
2005-05-29 12:07 ` Roger Sayle
2005-05-30 15:34 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-29 2:22 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2005-05-29 18:16 ` Marc Espie
2005-05-29 20:58 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-05-30 15:19 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-30 15:19 ` Marc Espie
2005-05-30 17:26 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-30 17:18 ` Marc Espie
2005-05-30 18:11 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-30 17:31 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-31 3:10 ` chris jefferson
2005-05-31 12:17 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-31 12:46 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-31 13:02 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-31 13:34 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 15:35 ` Bernhard R. Link
2005-05-30 18:59 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-30 19:16 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-05-30 19:17 ` Bernhard R. Link
2005-05-30 19:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-05-30 20:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-26 17:35 ` Kevin Handy
2005-05-26 17:41 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 20:26 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-26 21:15 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-26 21:17 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 23:25 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-27 0:18 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27 0:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-27 11:29 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-27 9:36 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-27 10:48 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-26 21:33 ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-27 0:05 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27 0:43 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-27 0:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 11:26 ` Russ Allbery
2005-05-27 13:56 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-29 3:36 ` Kai Henningsen
2005-05-26 17:53 Morten Welinder
2005-05-26 18:10 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 18:22 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 18:49 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 19:28 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 18:38 Morten Welinder
2005-05-26 20:58 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-26 23:31 Uros Bizjak
2005-05-26 23:52 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 23:56 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-26 23:57 ` Steven Bosscher
2005-05-27 15:09 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-05-27 15:28 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-27 18:27 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-26 23:59 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-27 15:19 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-27 0:39 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-27 0:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27 0:54 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-27 0:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27 12:42 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 4:32 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-28 5:02 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 10:44 ` Gary Funck
2005-05-28 6:42 Menezes, Evandro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9Xi8IrWmw-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).