From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-103009-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20633 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2004 21:04:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20624 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 21:04:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 21:04:38 -0000
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
	by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8KL7dQ1028757
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id <T6c289146be118064e13c0@mailgate1.apple.com>;
 Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:04:37 -0700
Received: from [17.201.20.186] (gambrinus.apple.com [17.201.20.186])
	by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8KL4Jhx018987;
	Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB09E5E-0B45-11D9-9884-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>
References: <414F37E0.3020509@codesourcery.com> <79845B6C-0B44-11D9-8A65-000A95D7CD40@apple.com> <CAB09E5E-0B45-11D9-9884-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <A224A25A-0B48-11D9-8A65-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
        Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>,
        Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
        Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
        Matt Austern <matt@lafstern.org>
From: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>
Subject: Re: DR handling for C++
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:26:00 -0000
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01196.txt.bz2

On Sep 20, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2004, at 4:34 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 2004, at 1:04 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>>
>>>   I think -fpermissive should just be removed.
>>
>> The eon SPECmark will no longer build if we do that.
>
> Huh? I had been building eon without -fpermissive for
> a long time.

Thanks, you are right.  Apparently I didn't notice when -fpermissive
stopped being necessary...I am sure it once was.
Never mind.