From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19499 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 20:08:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19361 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 20:08:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 20:08:33 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAJKEemr012268 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:09:12 -0800 Received: from [17.201.24.57] (polskifiat.apple.com [17.201.24.57]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAJK8Upa025344; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <10411191301.AA28464@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> References: <10411191301.AA28464@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: Ziemowit Laski Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:22:00 -0000 To: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00695.txt.bz2 On 19 Nov 2004, at 5.01, Richard Kenner wrote: > Since Geoff has objected to every design proposal I made, then > naturally I was (and am) expecting a constructive alternative. > > It would be nice if such a thing could be done, but I don't see it as > a requirement. It is, after all, your project and what you are > essentially doing is asking for him to do the design for you. I'm not asking for a design; I'm asking for a green light to pursue a design direction. And since none of my ideas are to Geoff's liking, then naturally I'd like to know what _would_ be to his (and other maintainers') liking. --Zem