From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" To: "'Christopher Faylor'" , Geoff Keating Cc: Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: Removal of V2 code Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 17:40:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00849.html I can't get cygwin to bootstrap, and haven't since early september. Given this, it is difficult to confirm that the change to V3 works > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [SMTP:cgf@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, 20 November 2000 12:24 > To: Geoff Keating > Cc: Mark Mitchell; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Removal of V2 code > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:10:33PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote: > >Mark Mitchell writes: > >> I plan on doing a `cvs remove' on the V2 sources, and removing the > >> configury bits for V2 at the end of next week as things seem to be > >> settling OK with V3. (There are still some AIX issues with V3, but > >> they seem to be well on the path to resolution.) > >> > >> If you have objections to this plan (i.e., you need the V2 sources to > >> continue your work), you should: > >> > >> - Try hard to get V3 working on your platform. > >> > >> - Complain to me. Explain why you can't switch to V3, and what > >> you need in order to make that happen. > >> > >> We can keep V2 in the tree for a bit longer, if we need to, but you'll > >> have to come up with a good reason... :-) > > > >The embedded platforms (*-elf, powerpc-eabi*, *-coff) don't work yet with > V3; I > >don't believe anyone, certainly not at Red Hat, will be able to fix > >this until next month; we don't have time. > > > >I don't know what the vxworks status is, but I'd bet it doesn't work > either. > > > >I don't know what the Cygwin status is. It may work. > > Cygwin should be ok. > > cgf