From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-166522-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18014 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2011 11:11:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 18005 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2011 11:11:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:11:12 +0000
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1519516fxm.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:11:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.87.68 with SMTP id v4mr23717fal.98.1294917070076; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.70.129 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:11:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2lj2ygzx1.fsf@whitebox.home>
References: <4D1C915C.10001@ispras.ru>	<OFFD96764C.38FEC784-ONC2257809.005BD5C2-C2257809.005D0F95@il.ibm.com>	<1294241704.7406.12.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com>	<OF65A7FEB3.C64B4914-ONC2257810.002BC31D-C2257810.002BDDE4@il.ibm.com>	<m2lj2ygzx1.fsf@whitebox.home>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTik9ip3aA3w9r-4an_DZESnQcJ6K_V9k6v4V04J_@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ARM] Implementing doloop pattern
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Revital1 Eres <ERES@il.ibm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>, Ayal Zaks <ZAKS@il.ibm.com>, 	cltang@codesourcery.com, dm@ispras.ru, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, yao@codesourcery.com, 	Roman Zhuykov <zhroma@ispras.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2

>> Index: config/arm/thumb2.md
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> --- config/arm/thumb2.md =A0 =A0 =A0(revision 168424)
>> +++ config/arm/thumb2.md =A0 =A0 =A0(working copy)
>
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0??? The possible introduction of a new block to initialize =
the
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0new IV can potentially effects branch optimizations. =A0*/
>
> s/effects/effect/

Err I think it should be "affect" rather than effect here.

Thus s/effects/affect


Ramana