From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19282 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2010 16:39:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 19267 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2010 16:39:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:39:09 +0000 Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1776115eyb.20 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:39:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.1.77 with SMTP id 55mr8044411wec.72.1285000410526; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.188.74 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:33:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C7D26EA.6020807@codesourcery.com> <4C83DB83.9080404@codesourcery.com> <4C83E189.1030601@codesourcery.com> <4C841725.4070603@net-b.de> <4C8523C6.10200@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010 From: NightStrike To: Andrew Haley Cc: Richard Guenther , Richard Guenther , Tobias Burnus , Gerald Pfeifer , Mark Mitchell , GCC , "Joseph S. Myers" , Jakub Jelinek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike wr= ote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther = wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>>>>>>> Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for refe= rence? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =A0From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0=95 The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runti= me library >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0builds. >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0=95 The DejaGNU testsuite has been run, and a substantial m= ajority of the >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0tests pass. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See for instance: >>>>>>> =A0 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00295.html >>>>>> >>>>>> There are no libstdc++ results in that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Richard. >>>>> >>>>> This is true. =A0I always run make check-gcc. =A0What should I be doi= ng instead? >>>> >>>> make -k check >>>> >>> >>> Ugh. =A0And I thought I was golden :) >>> >>> This apparently requires autogen to do something about >>> fixincludes/check.tpl. =A0I have no idea what that is or what that >>> means.... >> >> Just ignore the fixincludes test results. >> >> Andrew. >> > > Thanks! =A0Life just got easier again :) > > Running it with -j5. =A0Hopefully cygwin doesn't barf on that.. I know > cygwin used to have issues with -j. > Ok, so it took a while to eventually find out that cygwin still malfunctions with -j, and I get lots of "fork() blows because it can't figure out how to find ubiquitous resources" errors. However, I eventually got this to finish: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg01864.html So there's a complete testsuite that includes libstdc++ this time. I will now have this running continuously. Note that you won't see results every day -- it takes a LONG time to do this, mostly because I can't do -j on cygwin. I imagine results will be every 4 days or so if I run continuously. Is this enough now for us to qualify?