From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10520 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2011 15:43:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 10499 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2011 15:43:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:43:06 +0000 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48677) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0bpQ-0001Et-IY for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:43:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0bpP-0006CW-6x for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:43:04 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:52350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0bpO-0006BZ-Re for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:43:03 -0400 Received: from hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.7]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p2IFh119020109 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:43:01 -0700 Received: from vws18 (vws18.prod.google.com [10.241.21.146]) by hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p2IFgwEx030082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:59 -0700 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so3852446vws.26 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.71.239 with SMTP id y15mr1800566vdu.141.1300462977591; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.16.129 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D837CE3.8020605@oracle.com> References: <4D837A7B.8020005@oracle.com> <4D837CE3.8020605@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Spurious libstdc++ testsuite failures because of truncated buffered output From: Diego Novillo To: Paolo Carlini Cc: gcc@gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 216.239.44.51 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:40, Paolo Carlini wro= te: > On 03/18/2011 04:35 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >> >> I don't really know why the others don't fail, but I will take a look. >> =C2=A0In this particular case, the output is truncated after 1,032,134 >> bytes are printed. =C2=A0So I can only speculate that no other tests >> generate more than this number of bytes in output. =C2=A0I'll take a loo= k. > > For sure if it's the *overall* number of bytes that matters, working arou= nd > the issue is simple, because the testcase can be trivially split to 14 > separate tests, one for each operation. Yeah, I was thinking of splitting the test in several files. I'll send a patch later, if you think that's a reasonable thing to do. Thanks. Diego.