From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-163842-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17361 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2010 16:49:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 17350 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Aug 2010 16:49:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pv0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-pv0-f175.google.com) (74.125.83.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:49:17 +0000
Received: by pvg6 with SMTP id 6so2560466pvg.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.246.18 with SMTP id t18mr4569963wfh.270.1282582156195; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.33.132 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zkwgjo7n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <AANLkTikiQ3dRQuNjCNHKQk+QQ4pPYj14V-A5Brb0fan7@mail.gmail.com>	<87zkwgjo7n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimc2M=Qyf=Zs9+FktmPq7BPmKB_G1zJEg2UL6B4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Add uninitialized attribute?
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, 	"Kreitzer, David L" <david.l.kreitzer@intel.com>, "Girkar, Milind" <milind.girkar@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * H. J. Lu:
>
>> Sometime I have to do
>>
>> int x =3D 0;
>>
>> to silence gcc from uninitialized warnings when I know it is
>> unnecessary.
>
> I guess the official idiom is
>
> =A0int x =3D x;

That's what I thought as well, so I am confused.

> and it is somewhat used in the GNU project although it is not
> portable.

Neither is any of the other suggestions.

Richard.