From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-164406-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25129 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2010 18:22:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 25120 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2010 18:22:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:22:50 +0000
Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so5582762wwb.8        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.90.132 with SMTP id e4mr8164708wef.73.1285006968377; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.136.130 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikBvrdvLLFhybbiXgcpaOE2fk1wgGDSQT7g7sRm@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C7D26EA.6020807@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTi=KDNFoqzzJzCoJRCT0YW8ra1=Nv4CZ9hpV46UL@mail.gmail.com>	<4C83DB83.9080404@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTimNk+fD9dAVByQZsjYoRCiHd2eLQUnpw=QKjy6T@mail.gmail.com>	<4C83E189.1030601@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTina28s75jbjmHYd16DDt36fnPc1AkZ51NUwM2kd@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1009060008060.17560@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>	<4C841725.4070603@net-b.de>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1009061121430.28912@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>	<AANLkTi=EB-E2Vfr+qMmy1L2i_1rYHRx9dZsJaG4hFUTb@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTinCNxzQKMrsFNK3vQSGRrO7se5Sh_iO9uw=dTGS@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTikc2E4c3wCMJANzqdwA+U2wtrt7cbt5PA46mWb7@mail.gmail.com>	<4C8523C6.10200@redhat.com>	<AANLkTimYs=iewig4CR-aj4LxmxxgUTPkJy-fx=aK4dFz@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTikBvrdvLLFhybbiXgcpaOE2fk1wgGDSQT7g7sRm@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinJkxUTL4AOLUrGNHZvG5GSuUn=6VDQegwSb+8Y@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>, Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, 	Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, 	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2

On 20 September 2010 17:33, NightStrike wrote:
>
> Ok, so it took a while to eventually find out that cygwin still
> malfunctions with -j, and I get lots of "fork() blows because it can't
> figure out how to find ubiquitous resources" errors. =A0However, I
> eventually got this to finish:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg01864.html
>
> So there's a complete testsuite that includes libstdc++ this time. =A0I
> will now have this running continuously.
>
> Note that you won't see results every day -- it takes a LONG time to
> do this, mostly because I can't do -j on cygwin. =A0I imagine results
> will be every 4 days or so if I run continuously.
>
> Is this enough now for us to qualify?

Could you send me your libstdc++.log file?
I'm curious about some of the libstdc++ failures, which are in pretty
simple tests that shouldn't be target dependent.  There might be
something simple in testsuite_hooks.h or another common file that
causes all those failures.