From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-166585-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22068 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2011 08:42:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 22057 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2011 08:42:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:42:29 +0000
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4601112fxm.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:42:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.74.15 with SMTP id s15mr3136360faj.28.1295167347252; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.70.201 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:42:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D2DD88C.4020705@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik2wJirOgyQ+ophpOhH-hjSv3K3Xj4DPrPk545v@mail.gmail.com>	<mcry66r5x7k.fsf@google.com>	<AANLkTi=S47fNp-1Mr8cfYS0-V3iRpN8xRrgGyE63FxR0@mail.gmail.com>	<mcr8vyr5u9v.fsf@google.com>	<AANLkTimrGVFRGkQddNj7FmAO9mT8na2VxFFgzGyfyC76@mail.gmail.com>	<mcrmxn74apa.fsf@google.com>	<AANLkTimXqGVkBbw=sGYSUFiz4zurv_=t6dWL4W4qFNSo@mail.gmail.com>	<mcraaj6zled.fsf@google.com>	<AANLkTikxFVpdzXX1ATXRB+JQ8N8A0FbJG5b0jMx=Ztfj@mail.gmail.com>	<4D2DB1A7.8000605@redhat.com>	<4D2DD88C.4020705@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:42:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinqOtKn-yQovCou2wi3oRcUaz_JzHxgYwMCYRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Plus Reload
From: Gidi Nave <gidi.nave.1@gmail.com>
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> On 12/01/2011 13:50, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/11 01:45, Gidi Nave wrote:
>>
>>> One more question:
>>> GCC usually knows how to handle cases which need decomposition of
>>> expressions due to architecture limitations.
>>> In my case it didn't know.
>>> How can I foreseen additional such cases, in order to avoid compilation=
 crush?
>> I'm not sure there is a reasonable way other than experience and
>> intimate knowledge of how reload works.
>
> =A0If your port makes it all the way through the testsuite without any IC=
Es,
> you can feel at least /statistically/ re-assured that it's not likely to =
run
> into problems during regular day-to-day use.
>
> =A0 =A0cheers,
> =A0 =A0 =A0DaveK
>
>


Actually, this issue was found while running my testsuite...

Thanks,
Gidi.