From: "sean darcy" <seandarcy@hotmail.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Is it time to start using 4.0?
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY20-F2748FED4500C13DB2AB0F3BBC40@phx.gbl> (raw)
I'm using 3.4.3. I realize 4.0 isn't released and isn't suitable fro
production work, whatever that means.
But, does 4.0 generate sufficiently better code ( athlon ) to make it worth
the issues that may still remain?
FWIW, there's little I cou;ld find about the expected benefits - to the end
user - of the shift to the 4.0 architecture. Conformance? Speed of
compilation? Quality of code produced - size? speed? Or does the modular
nature allow for all these good things once the base works? IOW, wait for
4.1?
sean
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-20 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-21 0:24 sean darcy [this message]
2004-11-21 6:24 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-22 1:31 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-22 4:20 Bradley Lucier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY20-F2748FED4500C13DB2AB0F3BBC40@phx.gbl \
--to=seandarcy@hotmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).