From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-87126-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25844 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2003 18:24:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25799 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 18:24:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 18:24:48 -0000
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
	by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB8IOlnc023049
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scv3.apple.com (scv3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id <T6661c6ce17118064e15b8@mailgate1.apple.com>;
 Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:24:43 -0800
Received: from [17.201.20.186] (gambrinus.apple.com [17.201.20.186])
	by scv3.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB8IO90m026096;
	Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:24:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <10312081632.AA11626@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
References: <10312081632.AA11626@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-258865281
Message-Id: <BE952AB8-29AB-11D8-9EC2-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, pkoning@equallogic.com, Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>
From: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>
Subject: Re: Name of front-end
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:37:00 -0000
To: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2


--Apple-Mail-1-258865281
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed
Content-length: 546

On Dec 8, 2003, at 8:32 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
>     FWIW, some IBM 360 PL/1 manuals I just looked at do not mark or 
> claim
>     "PL/1" as trademark.
>
> But certainly some did.  And contemporary lore was that they 
> trademarked PL/2,
> PL/3, etc ...

I've heard this also, but it may well be a myth.   Here
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/v5pdf/DFSI10C6.PDF.
is an IBM manual, which talks about PL/I and contains a list of IBM
trademarks (p. 13 according to Acrobat, or xi according to the 
document),
and PL/I is not one of them.

--Apple-Mail-1-258865281
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII
Content-length: 710

On Dec 8, 2003, at 8:32 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:

<excerpt>    FWIW, some IBM 360 PL/1 manuals I just looked at do not
mark or claim

    "PL/1" as trademark.  


But certainly some did.  And contemporary lore was that they
trademarked PL/2,

PL/3, etc ...

</excerpt>

I've heard this also, but it may well be a myth.   Here

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,FFFF</param><x-tad-bigger>http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/ims/v5pdf/DFSI10C6.PDF</x-tad-bigger></color><x-tad-bigger>.

</x-tad-bigger></fontfamily>is an IBM manual, which talks about PL/I
and contains a list of IBM

trademarks (p. 13 according to Acrobat, or xi according to the
document), 

and PL/I is not one of them.


--Apple-Mail-1-258865281--