I got:

Script error: trying to process:
          O: PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m  (test for warnings,  
line 13)
         N:PASS:objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m  (test for warnings, line  
13)

:-(

mrs $ grep 'objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m'  06031600/objc.sum 06052905/ 
objc.sum
06031600/objc.sum:PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m  (test for  
warnings, line 13)
06031600/objc.sum:PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m  (test for  
warnings, line 13)
06031600/objc.sum:PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m (test for excess  
errors)
06052905/objc.sum:PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m  (test for  
warnings, line 13)
06052905/objc.sum:PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m  (test for  
warnings, line 13)
06052905/objc.sum:PASS: objc.dg/bad-receiver-type.m (test for excess  
errors)

Mine btw gives:

mrs $ cmp_logs  06031600/objc.sum 06052905/objc.sum
New tests that PASS:

objc.dg/dwarf-2.m (test for excess errors)
objc.dg/dwarf-2.m scan-assembler 0x10[^0-9a-f].*DW_AT_language
objc.dg/member-1.m  (test for errors, line 3)
objc.dg/member-1.m (test for excess errors)

Old tests that passed, that have disappeared: (Eeek!)

objc.dg/stubify-2.m scan-rtl-dump-not symbol_ref.*"objc_msgSend"


I tried all the results and couldn't find any that your script could  
analyze, except libgomp, but only because libgomp doesn't run on my  
system, so there are no results in it?  Is it just me?  I hand edited  
my results to be the first 30 or so from the Objective C++ testsuite,  
and then I got it to analyze and not dump out.

When I tried gcc, I had a chance to notice the timings, your version:

real    8m44.413s
user    2m0.714s
sys     7m54.847s

mine:

real    0m1.994s
user    0m1.756s
sys     0m0.556s

:-)  Maybe you only run the script on toy results?  Or, do you just  
drink lots of coffee?  Now, I know mine is well more than 10-100x  
slower than it could be, but waiting 2 seconds isn't a hardship for  
me.  Waiting 8 minutes strikes me as just a little slow.

The output of yours doesn't seem to be targeted for human eyes, the  
verbosity (at the least verbose setting) is about 121x more than mine  
for two random sets I had lying around, and that is with it cutting  
the output off really early due to the above problem.  I predict that  
in normal day to day use, it is well better than 120,000x larger.   
What use do you get out of it?

Mine was designed to do two things, figure out if the results are  
interesting and not send email, if they are not, and to show  
engineers the `interesting' detailed results in priority order.  It's  
meant to be run daily, and on good days, it produces no output.  On  
normal days, output is 20-30 lines at most.  It tries to balance the  
complaints with the occasional atta boy, to help with moral.