From: Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
To: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C949FF38-2681-48A5-94D9-0228551C5902@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de>
On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
> I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for mainline
> gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the gcc-patches and
> gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively silent regarding
> this topic. Is all the work done now or did the release plan slip
> backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)?
Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection
with no plan forward. The objection will either have to be withdrawn,
or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can be
made.
I think this should be resolved now, as as we push it forward, it will
pass the drop dead date, and objective-c++ will have to be jettisoned
from gcc 4.0.0. :-(
Mark, I suppose we can discuss when that drop dead date is. Has it
already passed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-17 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump [this message]
2004-11-17 21:53 ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02 ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50 ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 0:35 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:46 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18 1:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-11-18 23:28 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 0:57 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 1:26 ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19 1:41 ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19 4:26 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 5:49 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 6:42 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 7:52 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 3:22 ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04 ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08 ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C949FF38-2681-48A5-94D9-0228551C5902@apple.com \
--to=mrs@apple.com \
--cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).