From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5883 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 14:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5865 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 14:45:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 14:45:27 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (account dberlin [192.168.1.7] verified) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP-TLS id 5870920; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:45:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200401170613.i0H6Dkq2027085@speedy.slc.redhat.com> References: <200401170613.i0H6Dkq2027085@speedy.slc.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Diego Novillo , Gerald Pfeifer , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "Joseph S. Myers" From: Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:45:00 -0000 To: law@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01056.txt.bz2 > Err, no they aren't. For example we have a host of -f options which > control > debugging dumps rather than code generation. That's wrong. > Are you referring to -fdump-tree*? It is my understanding that this was already there when we started (and in fact, exists on the mainline too), we just extended it. It seems like a simple renaming job would address that concern anyway.